 |
|
| MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > Finale - Macintosh > Page Layout Problem--Very confusing and frustrating.... | Forum Quick Jump
|
   |  Dunbar Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2008 Total Posts : 94 | Posted 7/30/2010 12:59 PM (GMT -5) |   | Bill & Wiggy:
Thank you very much!
Let's see if I can employ your suggestions.
Carson | | Back to Top | |
 |  Dunbar Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2008 Total Posts : 94 | Posted 7/30/2010 1:03 PM (GMT -5) |   | Bill,
Thank you. That worked very well.
Best,
Carson | | Back to Top | |
  |  Dunbar Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2008 Total Posts : 94 | Posted 7/30/2010 2:18 PM (GMT -5) |   | Peter,
Thanks very much! This is most helpful.
Best,
Carson | | Back to Top | |
 |  Flint silly bear

       Date Joined Oct 2006 Total Posts : 1022 | Posted 7/30/2010 3:33 PM (GMT -5) |   | Carson, this isn't related to your question, but an observation:
In your Page 8.png file, you should break the secondary beam between the third and fourth sextuplets. Also, the mixed 16th triplets (in the first two bars) would be easier to read and less cluttered if you simply changed the staccato single sixteenth note in each figure to a staccato eighth note.
woodwind specialist and doubler - Finale 2011! using Speedy Entry - no capslock, GPO 2nd ed. Full version, Garritan Jazz & Big Band, Garritan Concert and Marching Band, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1, 4GB RAM, Soundblaster Audigy II zs
If the composer says in effect to the performer: "I do not care whether you perform my music or not," we cannot argue the matter. But if he indicates: "I want you to perform and respond to this music," then his fundamental duty is to write his music so that it is accessible to interpretation. When the performer cannot approach the composer's meaning because of capriciously obscure notation, he may in effect say to the composer: "Why should I bother to puzzle out your music?" - Gardner Read | | Back to Top | |
 |  Dunbar Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2008 Total Posts : 94 | Posted 7/30/2010 4:07 PM (GMT -5) |   | Flint,
Thank you for your kind suggestions. The secondary beams in sextuplets: is that common practice? If that is the case, then you have to label the sixteenths as triplets rather than sextuplets, right?
As to the downbeat sixteenth with staccato, I suppose your are right.
Thanks very much for your observation!
Yours,
Carson | | Back to Top | |
 |  Flint silly bear

       Date Joined Oct 2006 Total Posts : 1022 | Posted 7/30/2010 4:25 PM (GMT -5) |   |
Dunbar said... The secondary beams in sextuplets: is that common practice? If that is the case, then you have to label the sixteenths as triplets rather than sextuplets, right? It is common practice, yes. You do not have to relabel them as triplets, though. Keep it as a sextuplet, but break the 16th beam using the Secondary Beam Break Special Tool.
Example:
woodwind specialist and doubler - Finale 2011! using Speedy Entry - no capslock, GPO 2nd ed. Full version, Garritan Jazz & Big Band, Garritan Concert and Marching Band, Windows Vista 32-bit SP1, 4GB RAM, Soundblaster Audigy II zs
If the composer says in effect to the performer: "I do not care whether you perform my music or not," we cannot argue the matter. But if he indicates: "I want you to perform and respond to this music," then his fundamental duty is to write his music so that it is accessible to interpretation. When the performer cannot approach the composer's meaning because of capriciously obscure notation, he may in effect say to the composer: "Why should I bother to puzzle out your music?" - Gardner ReadPost Edited (Flint) : 7/30/2010 3:28:42 PM (GMT-5)
Image Attachment :
 tuplets.jpg 23KB (image/pjpeg)This image has been viewed 29 time(s). | | | |
| | Back to Top | |
 |  Dunbar Registered Member
        Date Joined Feb 2008 Total Posts : 94 | Posted 7/30/2010 5:07 PM (GMT -5) |   | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:42 PM (GMT -5) There are a total of 256,013 posts in 40,925 threads. In the last 3 days there were 46 new threads and 225 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 24423 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, stevestouffer. 25 Guest(s), 4 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details Flint, pickles7, oldtrumpet, Jetcopy |
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2010 |
|
|