Finale SmartMusic
  Home | Log In | Register | Search | Help
   
MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > Finale - Macintosh - FORUM HAS MOVED! > seriously going to swith to sibelius  Forum Quick Jump
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum. You cannot reply to topics in this forum. Printable Version
39 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Jess Hendricks
Fishlips



Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit Jess Hendricks's website.Send a Private Message to Jess HendricksAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 83
 
   Posted 3/15/2005 2:40 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have never encountered this bug, weird. I hope I don't, either. But I usually have one copy on both my laptop and desktop. I am very paranoid about losing any scores of my work.

I rarely work with part extraction recently because I have not had many recent performances. One thing I can say is I never minimized my parts, I just left them all open in a jumbled mass of windows. :) I think you guys need to actually try to reproduce this problem. If someone can make it happen, I bet the techs could fix it right up. Just a thought.
Back to Top

poco a poco
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit poco a poco's website.Send a Private Message to poco a pocoAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 193
 
   Posted 3/16/2005 4:27 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I will never minimize a window again in Finale, I will use exposé (bug don´t apply to exposé, right?) .

Even if the say the bug is fixed I´m scared of by this event.
Back to Top

Peter Thomsen
Registered Member

Click to send Peter Thomsen email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Peter ThomsenAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2000
Total Posts : 8331
 
   Posted 3/16/2005 12:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
swedish compis,

Yet another option:
You can also cycle through Finale's open document windows with Command-`.

On a swedish keyboard, the key may have another symbol painted on it (perhaps <), but the hotkey (Command-<) should still work.

Peter


Mac Finale 2004c & 2005b, Mac OS X 10.3.8, iMac G4 1.25 GHz, 1 GB RAM

Back to Top

poco a poco
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit poco a poco's website.Send a Private Message to poco a pocoAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 193
 
   Posted 3/17/2005 7:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks Peter, the problem with shortcuts on keyboardlayouts other than english is that some keys are quite different, cause of the languange. I´m thinking of getting a keyboard with english layout just for this problem, they are not easy to find on this side of the atlantic though.
Back to Top

Slandrom
Registered Member



Click to send Slandrom email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to SlandromAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 1999
Total Posts : 1792
 
   Posted 3/18/2005 1:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
swedish compis said...
Thanks Peter, the problem with shortcuts on keyboardlayouts other than english is that some keys are quite different, cause of the languange. I´m thinking of getting a keyboard with english layout just for this problem, they are not easy to find on this side of the atlantic though.


The easiest way to solve these problems is still to use QuicKeys or equal programs.

Björn


2002b, 2005b MacOSX 10.3 and classic, sometimes Win98, TgTools (always the latest) QuicKeys X3, 2.0.2 GPO, Dual G4 1ghz. 2 Gb ram, Apple Cinema Display 23"

Back to Top

bgoldes@alfred.com
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to bgoldes@alfred.comAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2001
Total Posts : 16
 
   Posted 11/30/2006 7:12 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
just so you know, this bug is still alive and well as of November 30, 2006. Following is the text addressing the issue. It was sent to Finale Tech Support as well as posted on 11-30-06 at the Finale for Macintosh forum. It was through the replies of users that I learned of the file overwrite bug.

Twice in the last several days I have had the following occur. The latest instance is addressed:
I had two Finale files open: one, a score (26367 GlorytotheKing_S.mus), the other, a piano and choral piece (26363GlorySATB.mus) (the latter was NOT extracted from the former, it was created separately). The score was the file I was actively working on at the time of the malfunction. The SATB file was open for reference. I was making changes to the score and making frequent saves. I did NOT perform Save As. I use QuicKeys in Finale and noticed that I was not getting any response when using the keyboard command to change Finale tools. In order to rectify this situation, I quit Finale. When I reopened the score file with the name 26367 GlorytotheKing_S.mus, it had become the same as the SATB file. How is this possible?
Back to Top

John Iafrate
Registered Member

Click to send John Iafrate email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to John IafrateAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Sep 2001
Total Posts : 504
 
   Posted 11/30/2006 8:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have never used Expose, but I have had multiple extracted opened at the same time as well as the score being opened. I have had multiple extracted pages opened and placed in the dock. Every situation that has been named, I have been in and have never had the problem that is described happen to me. Mind you, the only thing that is different is that I have never used Expose.

John Iafrate
Back to Top

SF
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to SFAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 1555
 
   Posted 11/30/2006 9:42 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Well it looks like there are 2 post dealing with the same issue.

The issue of putting them in the Dock or not is just an example of when this bug MIGHT bite you. No one really knows. But over the many emails and forum postings about this issue placing them in the Dock seems to be one of the criteria...but who really knows. I've had a number of files in the dock and none of them have been overwritten but I surely don't want it to happen to me so I avoid it. Since I never really had the luxury of the dock in OS9, I continue working like I'm in OS9 with file management.

This issue is long overdue for a serious look. The one App I could always count on in OS9 was Finale. Now moving to OSX and working in Finale I feel like I'm in a Microsoft world listening to all of the windows people from the past talking about how files become corrupt like it's just a normal thing and that I should expect it every once in a while.

Boy I really dislike this issue with Finale...switch to Sibelius...I need the power of Finale not the "strict engraving rules" of the Finn brothers.

SF

Post Edited (SF) : 11/30/2006 9:14:12 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top

Gordon
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to GordonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined May 1999
Total Posts : 236
 
   Posted 12/1/2006 3:32 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Like Finale, Sibelius has autosave and backup. However, Sibelius uses a feature whereby the autosave will save your file every now and again and give is number filename1, filename2, filename3, etc. It auto deletes when this number gets to about filename40, I think. If you get a power bump or shut down your computer, it asks if you want to recover the last version. A nice feature. This is separate from the backup, which can be timed as in Finale.
I use both apps, and I like to point out good Finale features on the Sibelius site too:-)


Gordon
Computer: Dual 2 Ghz PowerPC G5, OS X Tiger, Finale 2007, Sibelius 4.1.5, Harmony Assistant 9.2.2a.
Audio Equip: Presonus Firebox, Korg X5DR, Yamaha PSR-230 Piano, MX602A Behringer mixer.

Back to Top

Stephen Siegel
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Stephen SiegelAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2004
Total Posts : 827
 
   Posted 12/1/2006 12:32 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Peter:

I would, very emphatically, NOT trust Apple's Backup software. I had a disk crash and attempted to retrieve files that I had backed up to the .mac server and to an external disk using Backup. It didn't work.

Apple's tech support said: "Thank you for contacting Apple. If you have experienced issues with your directory structure, you may not be able to restore your previous archives in the normal fashion."

They went on to describe an elaborate procedure which also DID NOT work. They said they would get to back to me with a solution, but NOTHING they suggested EVER worked. Thus, in the one circumstance where having a backup is essential - - a damaged disk and directory, Backup proved utterly useless. What Backup did was to create an illusion of security which, as illusions tend to do, failed completely when stressed by reality.

As a result of previous experiences with hard drive failures, I believe in redundancy so, in addition to Backup, I had backed up - - in triplicate - - to tape using Dantz's Retrospect. However, two hours into reconstructing the catalog from tape backup set A, Retrospect announced it had encountered an unrecoverable tape error and aborted the the restore process!

I then started again with tape backup set B and during a 6 hour (rather tense) process was able to restore the disk completely. This memorable experience convinced me of the following:

1. NEVER use Apple's Backup software

2. Do not use tape as a backup medium.

Since hard drives are relatively inexpensive these days ($75 for a 250GB SATA drive from NewEgg.com) and infinitely more reliable than expensive ($1000 and up) tape mechanisms, I purchased a hotswap Sata drive enclosure, several drive trays and a SATA PCI card for my G5 (I could have purchased a hotswap Firewire enclosure instead but that would have been more expensive and slower). I have multiple hard drives and use two different backup applications. SuperDuper which makes a clone of the main hard drive and Retrospect which makes incremental backups (so that, unlike a clone - - which has only the most recent version of a file - - you can retrieve all previously backed up versions of a file). Total cost for 4 drives, housing and card was about $500. Not insignificant in itself, but trivial in comparison to the costs of losing data permanently. Also significant is the fact that these drives are only on for the time it takes to do a backup, so their life expectancy is probably many years longer than it would be if they were in constant use. (Contrast this with 50GB tapes that cost $50 and may fail after only a few uses in even a well-maintained tape mechanism.) All drives except the one currently used for backup are stored off-site in a bank vault - - which means that if the whole studio went up in smoke (and I survived), I would still have almost all my data.

Supposedly the next version of OSX, aka Leopard, will have a built in backup application called "Time Machine" that will create incremental backups. Given my experience with Apple's Backup, I would test this carefully before trusting it. Retrospect and SuperDuper are currently available have the significant advantage of actually providing data security rather than creating an illusion of it.


Stephen Siegel
Dual 2.5 GHz G5 Powermac
7GB RAM
OS 10.4.8
MOTU MIDI Time Piece
MOTU 2408 mk.3 audio interface
Logic 7.2.3
Digital Performer 4.6.1
Kurzweil K2600
Windows XP machine running Gigastudio

Post Edited (Stephen Siegel) : 12/1/2006 11:42:11 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top

jrthom1
Registered Member

Click to send jrthom1 email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to jrthom1AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableClick to Add james_thomas58 to Your Y! Friends List.Click to Add jrthom1@hotmail.com to your MSN Buddy List.
Date Joined Jan 1999
Total Posts : 217
 
   Posted 12/1/2006 1:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Gordon said...
Like Finale, Sibelius has autosave and backup. However, Sibelius uses a feature whereby the autosave will save your file every now and again and give is number filename1, filename2, filename3, etc. It auto deletes when this number gets to about filename40, I think. If you get a power bump or shut down your computer, it asks if you want to recover the last version. A nice feature. This is separate from the backup, which can be timed as in Finale.
I use both apps, and I like to point out good Finale features on the Sibelius site too:-)

I use the Windows version of Finale and have not had this issue come up with overwriting files and I do have autosaved files on. Is this purely a Mac issue?
 
I also use both Finale and Sibelius depending on the needs of my clients. The auto save feature of Sibelius is very good indeed.
 
James


"Freedom Above All!" - Ludwig Van Beethoven
 
"Mathematics is music for the mind. Music is mathematics for the soul." Anonymous (18th Century)
 
"Music is a kind of counting performed by the mind without knowing that it is counting" - G.W. Leibnitz (1714)
 
 
 

Back to Top

musicofnote
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailableClick to visit musicofnote's website.Private Messaging Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2001
Total Posts : 490
 
   Posted 12/2/2006 12:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Perfect time for thread drift.

Backup media.

We've had great success with ventilated double (S)ATA housings from Pyorgate. USB 2.0 and FW800. The problem is, the company - Pyrogate - doesn't make 4-bay enclosures and we're looking for a ventilated 4-bay FW enclosure. I've only found a couple of vendors on the web that offer these, but hate to put out the money they're asking without recommendations. Serious studio musicians often use these things, so this would seem like a great place to ask ...

Thanks in advance!


greetings


University of Applied Sciences
Northwestern Switzerland in Aarau

Leonard Cecil, ACHDS, ACTC, ACSA
Systems Engineer
Department of Design and Media Art
(Apple Certified Help Desk Specialist,
AC-Technical Coordinator, AC-System Administrator)

http://www.fhnw.ch
http://hyperion.fh-aargau.ch

and
Music of Note - Music Notation Workshop
http://www.music-of-note.ch

------------
1-Mac AGP w/1.4 GHz, 1GB RAM, OS 10.4.8
1-MacBookPro w/2GHz, 2GB RAM, OS 10.4.8, XP SP2, Win2K
1-Cube w/ 1.2 GHz, 1GB RAM, OS 10.4.8 Server
1-IBM ThinkPad T-22 w/ 900mhz, 512 MB RAM, XP SP2 and SuSE 10
1-Greater Swiss Mountain Dog Mix (Luna) w/ BH1 (BH-2 except tracking) & Search and Rescue trained ;-)

Back to Top

jcraig1
Registered Member

Click to send jcraig1 email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to jcraig1AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Dec 1998
Total Posts : 842
 
   Posted 12/2/2006 9:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
There is no one I know that does not use sequential saves to avoid exactly this sort of problem. By saving the file with a new name (01, 02, 03, etc) every so often, you can avoid losing too much work if this happens. How to protect against the bug is something else, but reverting to an earlier version is certainly preferable to losing everything.
It may be an extra step but will pay off in the end.

Not much consolation at this point tho'


Joel Craig
Craig Music Services
New York City/Florida

FIN 2006d, 2007,
OS 10.4.8
PowerMac G4 dual 867, 768 memory,
14" iBook G4 for travel,
Apple 23" Cinema HD Display,
Yamaha PSR-530, Edirol UM-2,
hp laserjet 2200d, Kensington Turbo Mouse

Back to Top

Stephen Siegel
Registered Member



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Stephen SiegelAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Oct 2004
Total Posts : 827
 
   Posted 12/2/2006 2:37 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Leonard:

Do you want an enclosure with hot-swap drive bays or are fixed drives ok? Must the 4 drive enclosure be Firewire? Firewire enclosures are more expensive than SATA enclosures because they have bridgeboards. (Of course you'd need to have a SATA PCI card for external SATA drives) If you must have Firewire you might check out the offerings of FireWire Depot. If you decide to go with SATA, Firmtek/Seritek makes a very high quality 4 drive enclosure with multiple speed fans, hot swap trays, advanced design (no wiring - - everything connects directly to the backpane), and shielded E-SATA connectors. Seritek also make an excellent PCI card with 4 external ports. Unlike most SATA cards, the Seritek card allows you to boot from any connected external SATA drive.


Stephen Siegel
Dual 2.5 GHz G5 Powermac
7GB RAM
OS 10.4.8
MOTU MIDI Time Piece
MOTU 2408 mk.3 audio interface
Logic 7.2.3
Digital Performer 4.6.1
Kurzweil K2600
Windows XP machine running Gigastudio

Back to Top
You cannot post new topics in this forum. You cannot reply to topics in this forum. Printable Version
39 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Tuesday, December 19, 2023 8:22 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 403,820 posts in 58,165 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads