|
|
MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > Finale - Windows - FORUM HAS MOVED! > "Linked parts" seem to not really be linked | Forum Quick Jump
|
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/17/2015 12:37 AM (GMT -6) | | Could anyone please help me with a set of parts I already created but am having trouble making use of the linked parts feature?
I created a set of parts from a full orchestra score in Finale 2012 last year. I am assuming that these are "linked parts" simply because when I go to create parts it lists them as "linked parts", however ... now that I have recently made many changes to the score (such as changing a few notes, and especially adding rehearsal letters) I am not seeing these changes reflected in the parts. How can I make the parts update without having to create a complete set of new parts? I spent a great deal of time tweaking the formatting on each part and I do not want to lose those changes.
Maybe the problem here is that I might have changed the file name of the parts, or the problem could be that the parts have been moved from their original locations to new folders. Is there any way to check if the part is indeed still linked? Or any way to re-link it???
THANKS for any helpful advice! | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/17/2015 2:03 AM (GMT -6) | | yes, unfortunately it is looking like they are indeed extracted. | Back to Top | |
| Peter Thomsen Registered Member
Date Joined Jun 2000 Total Posts : 8331 | Posted 6/17/2015 6:01 AM (GMT -6) | | Just to make things clear:
1) Linked parts are not separate documents, but rather included in the same document as the score. To view the linked parts - and edit their layout - go to Document menu > Edit Part > …
2) Extracted parts are based on the linked parts. In Other Words: You can not have extracted parts without also having linked parts. If linked parts are not yet generated, Finale will automatically generate linked parts when you tell Finale to extract parts.
3) In many cases there is no need to extract parts. You can use the linked parts instead - view the parts, and print them.
Peter Mac Finale, 2011c, 2012c & 2014d, Dolet 6.4 plug-in, Mac OS X 10.9.5, iMac Intel Core i7, 2.93 GHz, 16 GB RAM | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/17/2015 7:05 PM (GMT -6) | | Thanks for the clearer explanation, Peter. I found the linked parts under the Document menu. Unfortunately, I didn't know about Linked parts when I previously extracted the parts and made considerable layout changes to that set of parts. So now I am stuck with a separate set of parts in addition to the linked parts which unfortunately are not formatted in the layout I want. It looks like it will be a real lengthy job to get the layout how I want it (with page turns in convenient places), but I probably have no way to update those older parts that have already been extracted. I doubt there is any solution to this problem. But if anyone has any advice .... next time I just won't extract and will only work with the linked parts under the document menu. | Back to Top | |
| Zuill "The Troll"
Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 29077 | Posted 6/18/2015 10:36 AM (GMT -6) | | Neither Score Merger nor JW Copy Part Layout will work in this case. Possibly the Patterson plugin would, but the decision about the approach to use should depend on the time it takes and the reliability of the outcome. Another possible method would be to copy the contents of the score (one staff at a time) to the already formatted extracted parts. I believe the formatting would remain the same but the contents would be replaced. Chances are, this would be time intensive as well.
Zuill "When all is said and done, more is said than done."
Finale 2002b, 2003a, 2004b, 2005b, Win XP SP3, 2011b Win 7 64bit, 2012a Bought and Paid For (Hopefully soon 2012b with some of the MAJOR BUGS fixed--well, now with 2012b and some of the bugs are fixed) 2012c, with some bug fixes. 2014c at present. Now 2014d.
Favorite Forum quote: "Please, everybody, IGNORE THE TROLL!" | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/18/2015 2:50 PM (GMT -6) | | Thank you everyone. I especially liked Zuill's suggestion. | Back to Top | |
| Peter West Registered Member
Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 4272 | Posted 6/19/2015 4:36 PM (GMT -6) | | If you have changed tempo markings and/or added rehearsal markings, you can select the score, select copy, got to each part in turn, use the Edit filter to select only that category of Expressions and paste into each part. This will replace tempo markings, add rehearsal figures and not change anything else. It may be worth locking the systems first just to be sure.
If you copy then, while everything is still selected regenerate multi measure rests, any that need breaking to show new tempi changes or rehearsal numbers will break.
You can do a quick visual check as you go through and make the other minor adjustments you referred to.
It shouldn't take too long. It'll be far quicker than generating a new set of parts, or pasting the parts back into a new score. Basically, having done what you've done, you will now need to spend some time. Often with this kind of job it really is a case of less haste more speed. if you mess around trying to find a quick way, things invariably will not work the way you hope or expect and it will take longer than you imagine. If you have a good secure set of parts, just make a big pot of coffee, clear the desk and get on with it. Peter Music Publishing Services
********************* iMac 27 inch, 8GB RAM /OSX.10.10.1 +20 inch Cinema Display Finale 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014d/Logic Pro X
https://www.facebook.com/MusicPublishing http://musicpublishing.moonfruit.com | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/21/2015 1:15 PM (GMT -6) | | Thanks Peter, that copy and edit filter sound like a good idea which I will try out! | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/21/2015 8:56 PM (GMT -6) | | OMG PETER!!! YOU ARE THE BEST! THAT SAVES SO MUCH TIME T H A N K Y O U ! ! ! | Back to Top | |
| Peter West Registered Member
Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 4272 | Posted 6/23/2015 1:47 AM (GMT -6) | | I often get jobs where, after generating all parts and the first performance has happened, the composer wants to make significant changes. This has left me with a tool box of working processes which I fairly much take for granted now. In the circumstance you described, the copy filter would be my first option.
Many apps these days offer automation and various options for performing complex tasks (such as putting all the parts back into a score for example). While these often seem attractive, they are often not when the whole process is considered. There are always certain unknowns that we can fall foul of. For example, if you paste all the parts back into a score and then add the new tempi and rehearsal numbers, then re-extract the parts, will you retain or lose all the formatting of the original parts? I wouldn't take the risk. If you use your original score, you may retain some of the formatting, but perhaps not have any cues entered... and so on.
While the job may seem daunting, I much prefer the security of working with what I already have and getting on with it.
Glad it worked for you Peter Music Publishing Services
********************* iMac 27 inch, 8GB RAM /OSX.10.10.1 +20 inch Cinema Display Finale 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014d/Logic Pro X
https://www.facebook.com/MusicPublishing http://musicpublishing.moonfruit.com | Back to Top | |
| Conductor_Paul Registered Member
Date Joined Jan 2013 Total Posts : 13 | Posted 6/23/2015 2:12 AM (GMT -6) | | Thanks again, Peter. Yes, that did work. Still, I am having so many problems with other issues, so you may see me writing here more often ... | Back to Top | | Forum Information | Currently it is Tuesday, December 19, 2023 8:13 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 403,820 posts in 58,165 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2023 |
|
|