|
|
MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > FinaleScript - FORUM HAS MOVED! > SmartScore Lite??? Is it even worth it??? | Forum Quick Jump
|
| midnight Registered Member
Date Joined Oct 2004 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 10/20/2004 7:09 PM (GMT -6) | | Whats the deal with scaning??? sometimes it comes out good and other times i cant even recognize the page i just scaned. i meen i scaned the whole page and it only picked up the first 2 bars. or it just messes everything up to the point of no recognition.... Anyone know what Im doing wrong or how I can solve this issue??? To have a feature like this work only half the time doesnt seem worth it to me..... | Back to Top | |
| Robert P. Registered Member
Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 1691 | Posted 10/20/2004 11:20 PM (GMT -6) | | Claudia and Midnight (if not the same person),
My guess is that the FinaleScript section of the forum is not the right place to ask questions about SmartScore. You should try the Windows and/or Macintosh sections.
Good luck Robert | Back to Top | |
| Kittifer Registered Member
Date Joined Oct 2004 Total Posts : 12 | Posted 10/28/2004 11:25 AM (GMT -6) | | There are many variables that affect recognition results of scanned music: - The print quality of the original material (Should not be hand written or severely degraded) - The scanner settings selected when acquiring images (Scan 300-400 dpi in B&W or greyscale if possible) - The quality and behaviour of the the scanner itself (Musitek Tech Support recommends Epson and Canon scanners) e.g. HP all-in-one scanners create nearly useless "Black and White" images becasuse they are scanned in color (and remain in RGB color mode) and are then reprocessed to appear "Black and White" by a process called "dithering" that degrades solid areas of black into "salt and pepper". Good for photos. Bad for OCR. "Thresholding" retains solid areas of black. NOTE: SmartScore Lite in Finale 2005 handles greyscale images. Better to choose "Grey" than "Black" if you are using and all-in-one scanner.
The biggest variable is going to be the software you use for recognition. There seems to be some confusion on this forum between SmartScore Lite and SmartScore Pro. SmartScore Lite is merely the recognition engine which passes unedited datat directly to Finale. The Pro version has it's own scanning interface with automatic resolution option, recognizes articulations, dynamics, chord/fret symbols, lyrics and text. It also includes a host of useful automatic and semi-automatic editing and score manipulation features. My tests indicate SmartScore Pro and SharpEye to be essentially equal in accuracy with SmartScore ahead in the total number of symbols recognized (glissandos, arpeggios, chord symbols, pedal markings, etc.). The cost of the Pro Edition is $199 to owners of Finale 2000+,the same price as SharpEye with Finale Plug-in.
Fully functional demos of the SmartScore Pro and Songbook editions demo can downloaded from: http://www.musitek.com/downloads.html
Test them all and make up your own mind. Kittifer | Back to Top | |
| TedMuller Registered Member
Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 6 | Posted 11/15/2005 2:45 PM (GMT -6) | | Hlo. Forget about Smartscore. And forget about the Sibelius equivalent, Photoscore. Both are garbage. Get Sharpeye. It reads scans much better, and saves files in XML format, readable by Finale's built-in Dolet plug-in. | Back to Top | |
| John Birch Registered Member
Date Joined Nov 2003 Total Posts : 44 | Posted 11/16/2005 2:36 PM (GMT -6) | | I agree with most of what has been said above but i have found that the higher the resolution in scanning, the better the chance of an accurate, reasonable result. I must say that I do get irrated by the way Finale (and other such programmes) brag about how "powerful" their programme is and its ability to do this and that, and make it out to be soooo quick and easy to achieve everything! It's not like that in reality. | Back to Top | |
| Kittifer Registered Member
Date Joined Oct 2004 Total Posts : 12 | Posted 12/30/2005 1:29 AM (GMT -6) | | I upgraded from SmartScoreLite to the Songbook and I get consistently good results. It only cost me $99 and I use it all the time. The SmartScore to Finale import feature works well and I understand they (the Smartscore people) are about to support MusicXML in their new release, so you can have your choice of filters. Sharpeye misses a lot of the complexities Smartscore captures. Sounds like you didnt' test 'em all. I sure did.
========= Forget about Smartscore. And forget about the Sibelius equivalent, Photoscore. Both are garbage. Get Sharpeye. It reads scans much better, and saves files in XML format, readable by Finale's built-in Dolet plug-in. | Back to Top | | Forum Information | Currently it is Tuesday, December 19, 2023 7:55 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 403,820 posts in 58,165 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2023 |
|
|