Finale SmartMusic
  Home | Log In | Register | Search | Help
   
MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > Finale - Macintosh - FORUM HAS MOVED! > Notation question: tied notes with staccato dots?  Forum Quick Jump
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum. You cannot reply to topics in this forum. Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Andrew Harrison
Registered Member

Click to send Andrew Harrison email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Andrew HarrisonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 136
 
   Posted 10/22/2016 2:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hi all,

I'm preparing a score of mine (from 2014) for publication, and I've realised that in bars 1 - 3, I've written a tied note that ultimately finishes with a staccato dot over the end of the sound. I'm pretty sure that what I wanted was a single, continuous sound that gets progressively louder, and that has a short, crisp cut-off.

However, I'm not sure if this notation is a tautology, and whether, in fact, the wind and brass players would need to re-articulate the note in bar 3; effectively getting rid of the need for a tie in bar 2. (I've attached the page of the score in question).

I'm keen to hear what others think, particularly those from a publishing background. The piece was written for a 'hybrid' ensemble, that included players with backgrounds in both jazz and classical music.

Many thanks for your help!

Regards,
ANDREW


Andrew Harrison
Composer/pianist
www.andrewharrison.com.au
twitter:@AHarrisonMusic
Mac Pro running 10.7.5, Finale 2014d.v5545
Macbook Pro running 10.11.2, Finale 2014.5.7098



File Attachment :
Gassed Shell (Severe)_page one.pdf   89KB (application/pdf)
This file has been downloaded 289 time(s).
Back to Top

Peter Thomsen
Registered Member

Click to send Peter Thomsen email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Peter ThomsenAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2000
Total Posts : 8331
 
   Posted 10/22/2016 2:56 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Indeed the staccato dot can look confusing in combination with the tie.

Instead of the tied 8th it might be safer to notate a 16th - without a staccato dot.

Or perhaps just notate as it is, but without the staccato dot?
When heard in the context it is obvious that the percussion cuts off the chord,

Peter


Mac Finale, 2012c, 2014d & 2014.5, Dolet 6.6 plug-in, Mac OS X 10.11.6, iMac Intel Core i7, 2.93 GHz, 16 GB RAM

Back to Top

Andrew Harrison
Registered Member

Click to send Andrew Harrison email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Andrew HarrisonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 136
 
   Posted 10/22/2016 3:02 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks Peter. Yes, I thought that a 1/16 might be a good idea.

What do you think about a 1/16 note with an accent above it, tied to the previous note?

Thanks,
ANDREW


Andrew Harrison
Composer/pianist
www.andrewharrison.com.au
twitter:@AHarrisonMusic
Mac Pro running 10.7.5, Finale 2014d.v5545
Macbook Pro running 10.11.2, Finale 2014.5.7098

Back to Top

Peter Thomsen
Registered Member

Click to send Peter Thomsen email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Peter ThomsenAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jun 2000
Total Posts : 8331
 
   Posted 10/22/2016 3:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Andrew Harrison said...
… What do you think about a 1/16 note with an accent above it, tied to the previous note? …

I would find the accent confusing - and unnecessary.

Perhaps it is just me, but I find this culmination easy to understand - impossible to misunderstand when heard in context.
The crescendo, the ff and the percussion say it all.

Peter


Mac Finale, 2012c, 2014d & 2014.5, Dolet 6.6 plug-in, Mac OS X 10.11.6, iMac Intel Core i7, 2.93 GHz, 16 GB RAM

Back to Top

Andrew Harrison
Registered Member

Click to send Andrew Harrison email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to Andrew HarrisonAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 136
 
   Posted 10/22/2016 3:10 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks Peter.

Regards,
ANDREW


Andrew Harrison
Composer/pianist
www.andrewharrison.com.au
twitter:@AHarrisonMusic
Mac Pro running 10.7.5, Finale 2014d.v5545
Macbook Pro running 10.11.2, Finale 2014.5.7098

Back to Top

OCTO.
The radical answers.



Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableSend a Private Message to OCTO.AIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jul 2008
Total Posts : 2659
 
   Posted 10/23/2016 12:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If you want to have a continuous sound, use expression.
<sf
or
<ff
To use 16-note is perfectly OK.

And please use "Score in C".


NOTAT.IO - NOTATION FORUM

Finale 2014.d 2014.5
Yosemite, MPB 15', 16GB RAM.
+ iMac + MacBook - older.

Back to Top
You cannot post new topics in this forum. You cannot reply to topics in this forum. Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Tuesday, December 19, 2023 8:06 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 403,820 posts in 58,165 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads