|
|
MakeMusic Forum > Public Forums > Finale - Macintosh - FORUM HAS MOVED! > 1/8 Notes w/ grouping | Forum Quick Jump
|
    |  MikeHalloran Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 217 | Posted 10/31/2016 6:50 AM (GMT -5) |   | Through the '80s and still practiced by many, the convention is to leave vocal lines unbeamed. I know many older singers who find beamed scores difficult to read. The advent of notation software and arrangers who never learned how to write vocal music has made beamed vocal scores commonplace and singers have adapted for the most part.
You can set Finale so that it will not beam by default.
/usermanuals.finalemusic.com/FinaleMac/Content/Finale/Beaming.htm#Preventing_Finale_from_beaming_automatically__Speedy_Entry_
I prefer to let Finale beam as normal and then break the beams on the vocal lines—or did. I don't pay attention to this anymore since few complain about unbeamed vocal lines anymore—and no one listens anyway.
I never understood why Finale uses a plugin to accomplish what every other notation app can do in the Notes menu—but it does:
/usermanuals.finalemusic.com/FinaleMac/Content/Finale/Patterson_Beams_Plug_in.htm Finale 25, 2014.5, SmartScore X Pro II, Encore 5.07, GPO 5 2010 iMac i7, 32G RAM, 2T SSD, Late 2013 MacBook Air, OS 10.12 MOTU Digital Performer 9.12, 9.02, Logic Pro X 10.2.4 | Back to Top | |
   |  Vaughan Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 1999 Total Posts : 4984 | Posted 10/31/2016 9:28 AM (GMT -5) |   | MikeHalloran said... Through the '80s and still practiced by many, the convention is to leave vocal lines unbeamed. I know many older singers who find beamed scores difficult to read. The advent of notation software and arrangers who never learned how to write vocal music has made beamed vocal scores commonplace and singers have adapted for the most part. When the notation makes it perfectly clear under which notes the syllables fall, why shouldn't singers read rhythmical patterns the way all other musicians do? I can imagine that there are a lot of 'older singers' who don't like being confronted with esoteric matters like relative note lengths, rhythmic subdivisions, etc. What's really difficult to read is a string of equidistant, separately-beamed notes, some of which are 8ths, some of which are 16ths and with the occasional 32nds thrown in. In any case, nowadays many agree (Gould, American Choral Society, etc.) that vocal lines should be beamed to show metric subdivisions. Vaughan
Finale 3.2 - 25, Sibelius 4 - 7 Patterson's plugins, Tobias' plugins, full version, waiting for Jari's plugin update MacOS 10.12 MacPro (2016) 16 GB, MacBookPro (2011) 8 GB
Amsterdam | Back to Top | |
  |  MikeHalloran Registered Member
        Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 217 | Posted 10/31/2016 12:54 PM (GMT -5) |   | Vaughan said...MikeHalloran said... Through the '80s and still practiced by many, the convention is to leave vocal lines unbeamed. I know many older singers who find beamed scores difficult to read. The advent of notation software and arrangers who never learned how to write vocal music has made beamed vocal scores commonplace and singers have adapted for the most part. When the notation makes it perfectly clear under which notes the syllables fall, why shouldn't singers read rhythmical patterns the way all other musicians do? I can imagine that there are a lot of 'older singers' who don't like being confronted with esoteric matters like relative note lengths, rhythmic subdivisions, etc. What's really difficult to read is a string of equidistant, separately-beamed notes, some of which are 8ths, some of which are 16ths and with the occasional 32nds thrown in. In any case, nowadays many agree (Gould, American Choral Society, etc.) that vocal lines should be beamed to show metric subdivisions. I have no position in this argument and am only the messenger. A few years ago, I decided to go with the new way. I sat in with in a choir just yesterday and heard someone complain.
I can see unbeaming recitative. Now you know how. Finale 25, 2014.5, SmartScore X Pro II, Encore 5.07, GPO 5 2010 iMac i7, 32G RAM, 2T SSD, Late 2013 MacBook Air, OS 10.12 MOTU Digital Performer 9.12, 9.02, Logic Pro X 10.2.4 | Back to Top | |
  |  kvehmane Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2008 Total Posts : 117 | Posted 11/1/2016 5:24 AM (GMT -5) |   | Already Alban Berg et al. used the "new" beaming in the '30s! In UE Lulu score (acts 1-2) there is a picture from the manuscript score; it is beamed by the beats, as an instrumental line. | Back to Top | |
Forum Information | Currently it is Saturday, September 23, 2023 11:54 PM (GMT -5) There are a total of 403,820 posts in 58,165 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2023 |
|
|